|
In the competitive arena that defines
semiconductor automatic test equipment
(ATE) decision making and selection,
once equipment is proven to be technically
capable of providing the necessary
test coverage for a customer’s device, the
critical deciding factor becomes the
equipment’s cost of ownership (CoO).
Since there may be more than one technically
viable solution, equipment selection
is most often determined by CoO.
Technical differentiation does, of course,
exist. However, now more than ever,
technical differentiators are revealed in
the form of cost advantages, rather than a
simple ability vs. inability to test the part. In the competitive arena that defines
semiconductor automatic test equipment
(ATE) decision making and selection,
once equipment is proven to be technically
capable of providing the necessary
test coverage for a customer’s device, the
critical deciding factor becomes the
equipment’s cost of ownership (CoO).
Since there may be more than one technically
viable solution, equipment selection
is most often determined by CoO.
Technical differentiation does, of course,
exist. However, now more than ever,
technical differentiators are revealed in
the form of cost advantages, rather than a
simple ability vs. inability to test the part.
Please login below to access the full text of this paper. If you are not currently an online member or subscriber sign-up today, it's free. For online membership, click here.
Not a member? Sign
up today, it's free.
|