In Association With

Home
About Future-Fab
Download New Issue
Contact Us
Volume Archives
Editorial Panel

FUTURE FAB ARCHIVES


A Model for Determining ATE Cost of Ownership
(1/9/2007) Future Fab Intl. Issue 22
By Doug Lefever, Advantest
Print Article Print this paper
Send As Email Send as email

In the competitive arena that defines semiconductor automatic test equipment (ATE) decision making and selection, once equipment is proven to be technically capable of providing the necessary test coverage for a customer’s device, the critical deciding factor becomes the equipment’s cost of ownership (CoO). Since there may be more than one technically viable solution, equipment selection is most often determined by CoO. Technical differentiation does, of course, exist. However, now more than ever, technical differentiators are revealed in the form of cost advantages, rather than a simple ability vs. inability to test the part.

In the competitive arena that defines semiconductor automatic test equipment (ATE) decision making and selection, once equipment is proven to be technically capable of providing the necessary test coverage for a customer’s device, the critical deciding factor becomes the equipment’s cost of ownership (CoO). Since there may be more than one technically viable solution, equipment selection is most often determined by CoO. Technical differentiation does, of course, exist. However, now more than ever, technical differentiators are revealed in the form of cost advantages, rather than a simple ability vs. inability to test the part.

Please login below to access the full text of this paper. If you are not currently an online member or subscriber sign-up today, it's free. For online membership, click here.

Email:
  Remember my User ID 
 

Not a member? Sign up today, it's free.

 
 
Search




Published By:
38 Miller Avenue, Suite 9, Mill Valley, CA 94941
415.381.6800 | 415.381.6803
www.mazikmedia.com
converse@mazikmedia.com
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy